Return to the main Infowranglers site.
This Month
February 2010
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28
Login
User name:
Password:
Remember me 
View Article  Are you ears turning red? Habit Stream aims to make sharing plaudits simple

There's nothing as nice as receiving unsolicited customer testimonials and there's nothing as nice as being able to get them on your Web site quickly. In the old days testimonials came in via e-mail, if you were lucky. These days, if you're doing your job right you are likely to be receiving plaudits unbeknownst to you on a variety of social networks. A variety of tools such as Whos Talking, Samepoint and Social Mention exist which let you easily search across multiple social networks and blogs for mentions. The latter even gives you a neat little Flash widget that you can embed on your Web site so that visitors can see those mentions fly past.

But what if that stream contains some ... ahem ... less than complimentary mentions? That's where Habit Stream comes in, it's aim - to let you search multiple sources, choose only the nice things that people are saying about you and get them displayed on your site with the minimum of fuss.

The system is simple enough to operate:

  • Set up a "stream" that will containing a series of search terms.
  • Put the the terms into your stream.
  • Pick the items you like from the search results.
  • Create a "Broadcast" to display the results embedded on your site.

The "Broadcasts" come a three varieties so far, a customisable Flash widget, a "mini-site" option that can be embedded into the main site or linked to and a full API for developers with more ambitious plans for integrating the comments into their sites.

Habit Stream.jpg

Setting up searches and selecting items is simple, but the results need better filtering options - coming soon, apparently.

Some aspects of the service are clearly still a work-in-progress and not fully baked. 'Out of the box' it only searches a relatively small number of sources, although additional RSS and Atom feeds can be added to a search. Comments on YCombinator's Hacker News suggest that Habit is working hard to expand the selection. But the biggest problem is the sheer amount of noise that the searches currently include. The results tend to be cluttered with rubbish that cannot be adequately be filtered out since there isn't support for the full range of boolean search modifiers yet. Thus It is impossible to restrict results to only those posts that contain the words Chris Noble and the words "truly excellent" (something I've been Tweeting regularly - simply for the purposes of search testing, you understand).

Habit founder Devin Hunt says says the firm is working on a "robust filtering system" which it is hoped with solve some of these problems. But, to my mind the thing needed to make the service really useful is the provision of sentiment analysis, which which, even if not perfect could help bubble positive comments towards the top of the results. Integrating something like OpenAmplify, Calais or the like into the offering would make it more compelling. As an aside you can have fun seeing OpenAmplify sentiment analysis in action at Tweet Sentiments.

At the moment then, the service has potential, and the Broadcast module combined with the pick-and-choose Curating function certain a convenient way to get the right live comment onto a site. It's particularly well suited to PR agencies who can use it to seamlessly curate the content on their clients' sites... and can pass the cost along. Smaller, more tech-savvy operations are likely to be content to spend a few extra minutes needed to use the free search tools out there, copying and pasting the results into their sites content management system. A 30 day free trial is available, the ability to use fully customisable white-labelled embedding starts from $99 a month.

Habit Stream widget.jpg
Setting up the options for an embeddable widget is similarly simple
View Article  Google Friend Connect v Facebook Connect = chalk v cheese - at the moment
I’ve been helping a couple of people sort out their customer-facing sites recent and the same question has popped up: Google Friend Connect or FaceBook Connect? When Myspace weighed in with MySpaceID and promised to interoperate with Google Friend Connect, the questions multiplied. So as Christmas approaches, let me lean back against this mahogany fireplace, place my sherry carefully upon it and and expound for a moment.

Most of the initial debates that I’ve seen on suggest that this is an immediate battle and that Google/Facebook  are going head-to-head with comparable systems. Not so, in my opinion. While they both broadly aim to make Web sites more social, the offerings are in many respects very, very different. That may change in the future, but here’s the summary of where we are now:

Google Friend Connect

A Quick and dirty addition of social widgets to a Web site. Doesn’t really integrate into the existing site. Currently lacks an API, but expect that to change one day.

Pros

* Good for Non-coders with smaller sites who just want to cut and paste a widget in.
* Good for creating broad, loose networks.
* Expect to see wide availability of wide selection of apps (gadgets) as existing OpenSocial authors tweak their offerings.
* Open-ish - based upon OAuth, OpenSocial and OpenID.
* Support from Myspace, but limited details on integration at the moment.


Cons

* No API, so very limited ability to integrate social information into the mainstream site.
* Log-in is not integrated into the main site at the moment. So expect dual log-ins if your site already has user accounts.
* Not all OpenSocial apps work unmodified.

Facebook Connect

A more powerful system that allows integrated log-on and integration into an existing site thanks to its API. Implementation is more complex than Google Friend Connect.

Pros
* Proper single-sign-in tying site and social aspects together.
* Activity on your site can show up in users’ Facebook feeds - a nice viral way to promote the site.
* A full API giving site designers flexibility.
* Facebook users have to use their real names on your site. (Added veracity)

Cons
* More complex to implement.
* Tightly tied to the fortunes of Facebook.
* Facebook users have to use their real names on your site. (They might not want to)

The main advantages of Google Friend Connect is that a quick cut’n paste of some code is all that’s needed to integrate an open OpenSocial application (Google calls them gadgets) into your site. At the moment only a subset of OpenSocial applications worth in the Friend Connect environment Users can interact with these widgets using their existing Google, Yahoo, AOL, or OpenID credentials.

The relative simplicity of using the Google offering  is already garnering benefits for  the company. Twitter’s recent announcement of support for Google Friend Connect (A user can log in to a GFC-enabled site using their Twitter credentials) was initially this was seen as rejection of Facebook. But “not so” says Twitter in its blog. It’s just that integration with Facebook Connect and MySpaceID are still works in progress that “will require some development effort on our part.”

In the future expect to see Google make its offering more powerful (I would expect an API) and Facebook to help make its more simple. Already it has  added a directory of plug-ins that allow popular blog and Wiki packages to work with Connect.

And what of MySpaceID? To be honest it still appears something of a closed book to me since it really hasn’t launched properly yet. It is holding out the  promise of synchronization of social activity back to a user’s Myspace page, but isn’t there yet. It's not even absolutely clear how the promised interaction between MySpaceID and Google Friend Connect will work in practice. I’d hold fire until more details emerge.

I'll be revisiting this topic in the future to look at exactly how much knowledge you lose about your userbase by implementing something like Facebook Connect.

In the meantime - have a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.
View Article  Collaborative blogging tool Skribit readying new 'Pro' features.
Writer's block is a perennial problem - the average corporate blogger has  lots of interesting information tied up in their noggin. But how do they navigate the boundless seas of half-formed blog ideas and steer themselves towards the safe port of.... splosh... oops, my metaphor seems to have sunk. Never mind.

Anyway,  Skribit is a handy, free widget that can be integrated into any blog with the minimum of fuss. It lets readers propose topics for the blogger to write about, and it lets other readers vote on these ideas.

At first glance, you might think "so what - topics are often suggested in post comments anyway?" This is true. However the typically blogging set-up  reinforces an author-reader divide,. The blogger gets the big headline and large type-face text, the readers get the little comments tucked away.  The use of something like Skribit helps break down the barrier and brings the blogger's desire for interaction front-and-centre. And of course the blog author can always 'fly a kite' or two - proposing their own topics and watching how the voting goes.

Currently, the widget is implemented as an IFrame, and as you can see with the sample to the right, the styling it allows is a little rough-and ready. Its Javascript is also rather on the chunky side, which can slow page loading.  However some changes are in the works, first there is a new, lightweight version of the widget in development, which allows it to be styled using a blog's own CSS. Secondly there are moves afoot to try and put a business model for Skribit in place.

 Skribit doesn't look like a company yet, it hasn't apparently taken any VC financing and comprises three people: Student-founder Paul Stamatiou, developer-founder Calvin Yu and Lance Weatherby who is "Venture Catalyst" at Georgia Tech. and who appears to have a mentoring role.

However, it will start beta-testing a Pro version of the tool next month, according to a posting on the Get Satisfaction support site. The team has even started canavassing opinion as to what features should appear in the paid-for version. So far, support for multiple blogs, suggestion moderation, analytics and increased customisation all appear to be likely candidates.  That's good news since a decent revenue stream will increase the chances of a secure future for the the basic, free version.
View Article  Why this Blog will never be popular.

This then, is the first entry in the pun-tastically named Information Overlode, blog. And you, dear reader have stumbled upon it. So what's it all about?

First, I spend my working life talking to organisations about the benefits of using appropriate technology to communicate with customers, partners and employees,  so not having a blog is is almost something of a faux pas.  On the other hand, having a blog just for the sake of it, with no rhyme or reason is an even worse error. So like all good blog authors should, I had to consider whether this prospective blog would serve any purpose and whether it would be sustainable. 

 Initially then, I'll be using this blog as primarily a place for me to talk to myself and refine my thinking. As I come across useful tools, novel developments or interesting topics, I'll use this space to note, digest or analyse them.  Hopefully, along the way some of these posts will be helpful to others. 

"But surely", you are saying to yourself "Chris really wants this blog to be monster success with thousands of visitors and commentors every week".

It would be nice wouldn't it?  It is also entirely unrealistic. And it may be instructive to examine why: This blog will break three key rules which are necessary for business or tech blogs to thrive:

1. Keep it focused, serve a well-defined community.

The best corporate blogs serve a well defined purpose and/or a well defined community. The community might be existing customers, in the case of a product support blog. The purpose could be to shape opinion about the company and engage interest in the case of a CEO's blog, but they are well focused.  Which leads us to the relate point

2. Make it best-of-breed

Best of breed? Isn't that a tall order for most people?

Not really. If you are the Acme company selling Widget X, it tremendously easy for a blog to be best-of-breed. You simply make it the place where customers and potential customers learn about developments, support issues and the vision of future development. If you are feeling daring, you can even use the comments sections to back-and-forth with customers about their feelings with regards to your fabulous widget. Of course, by definition, disgruntled punters are likely to be over-represented. But with astute and intelligent handling, it is possible to publicly re-gruntle (most of) them.

3. Blog regularly

You might think that the use of RSS, Atom etc. Had obviated the need to blog regularly. But no. Most people do not currently use feeds. If you're waiting for me to give you some nice sound figures on the absolute numbers or proportion of Web users who use feeds, you are going to be disappointed. A quick browse around suggests a lack of solid research out there. But the figures that I have seen make me more than comfortable with saying that most do not.

Ergo your committed readers will only find your blog entries by regularly browsing to your site and if you regularly disappoint them by slacking off the updates visits will slowly dwindle. 

Initially this blog will assuredly break all three rules. I hope it will contain interesting and valuable items, but it won't be focussed on a particular community or be strongly themed. It won't be best-of-breed in the terms outlined above, and I certainly expect a hiatus or two (or three) in the publishing schedule.

So "Welcome" and  make sure that, when setting up your corporate blog you do as I say, not as I do.